Negation of the negation - Revision history

MrRedPropaganda at 18:34, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T18:34:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 9 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Lifted content}}		{{Lifted content}}

	Negation of the negation is one of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.)		'''Negation of the negation''' is one of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.)

	It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.		It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.

MrRedPropaganda at 18:34, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T18:34:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 9 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Lifted content}}		{{Lifted content}}

	~~One~~ of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.)		Negation of the negation is one of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.)

	It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.		It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.

MrRedPropaganda at 18:32, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T18:32:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 9 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	One of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.) It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.		{{Lifted content}}

	Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of appropriation, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But capitalist production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on cooperation and the possession in common of the land and of the means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.) Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of capitalism. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that elements of socialism are already contained within the framework of capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the expropriators are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation, which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of society—socialism. Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects, may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going backwards to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose. The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)		One of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.)

			It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.

			Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of appropriation, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But capitalist production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on cooperation and the possession in common of the land and of the means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.) Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of capitalism. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that elements of socialism are already contained within the framework of capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the expropriators are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation, which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of society—socialism.

			Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects, may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going backwards to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose. The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)

MrRedPropaganda at 03:33, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T03:33:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:33, 9 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			One of the basic laws or principles of dialectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declaring that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recognition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive, the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.) It is this that is meant when people speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions are created that make the return of fascism impossible.

	Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of appropriation, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But capitalist production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on cooperation and the possession in common of the land and of the means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.) Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of capitalism. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that elements of socialism are already contained within the framework of capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the expropriators are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation, which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of society—socialism. Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects, may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going backwards to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose. The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)		Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of appropriation, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But capitalist production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on cooperation and the possession in common of the land and of the means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.) Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of capitalism. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that elements of socialism are already contained within the framework of capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the expropriators are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation, which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of society—socialism. Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects, may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going backwards to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose. The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)

MrRedPropaganda at 03:32, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T03:32:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:32, 9 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~one of the basic laws or principles of dia-~~		Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of appropriation, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But capitalist production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on cooperation and the possession in common of the land and of the means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.) Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of capitalism. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that elements of socialism are already contained within the framework of capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the expropriators are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation, which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of society—socialism. Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects, may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going backwards to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose. The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)
	~~lectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal~~
	~~contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a~~
	~~struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is~~
	~~dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does~~
	~~not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting~~
	~~aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it.~~
	~~“Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declar-~~
	~~ing that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one~~
	~~likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recog-~~
	~~nition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive,~~
	~~the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical~~
	~~Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.) It is this that is meant when people~~
	~~speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of~~
	~~fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is~~
	~~not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism~~
	~~is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions~~
	~~are created that make the return of fascism impossible~~
	Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of ~~ap-~~
	~~propriation~~, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces
	capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual
	private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But ~~capi-~~
	~~talist~~ production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its
	own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-
	establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual
	property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on ~~co-~~
	~~operation~~ and the possession in common of the land and of the
	means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.)
	Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment
	of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept
	of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for
	the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of ~~capital-~~
	~~ism~~. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that ~~ele-~~
	~~ments~~ of socialism are already contained within the framework of
	capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order
	of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the ~~expropri-~~
	~~ators~~ are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation,
	which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of ~~society—~~
	~~socialism~~. Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of
	the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects,
	may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going ~~back-~~
	~~wards~~ to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose.
	The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of
	any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward
	movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus
	it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason
	extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of
	Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal
	and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in
	philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)

MrRedPropaganda: Created page with "one of the basic laws or principles of dia- lectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialecti..."

2026-05-09T03:29:28Z

Created page with "one of the basic laws or principles of dia- lectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it. “Negation in dialecti..."

New page

one of the basic laws or principles of dia-
lectics (see). Every object or condition, being made up of internal
contradictions, contains within itself its own negation. There is a
struggle within it between that which is growing and that which is
dying—between the old and the new. The negation of the old does
not signify, however, a useless, empty negation, a simple casting
aside of all that is old, as metaphysical thinking tends to conceive it.
“Negation in dialectics does not mean simply saying ‘no,’ or declar-
ing that something does not exist, or destroying it in any way one
likes.” (Engels, Anti-Dühring, p. 155.) Dialectics “demands a recog-
nition of the unity, that is, the connection of negative with positive,
the finding of the positive in the negative.” (Lenin, Philosophical
Notebooks, p. 217, Russian ed.) It is this that is meant when people
speak of turning a defeat into a victory, or again, the destruction of
fascism which is a return to the conditions that preceded fascism, is
not a dialectical destruction, for fascism will then arise again. Fascism
is only destroyed, when the negation is negated, when new conditions
are created that make the return of fascism impossible
Marx wrote in a famous passage: “The capitalist mode of ap-
propriation, the result of the capitalist mode of production, produces
capitalist private property. This is the first negation of individual
private property, as founded on the labor of the proprietor. But capi-
talist production begets, with the inexorability of a law of nature, its
own negation. It is the negation of negation. This does not re-
establish private property for the producer, but gives him individual
property based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era, i.e., on co-
operation and the possession in common of the land and of the
means of production.” (Capital, I, p. 837.)
Many of the basic ideas of Marxism represent the employment
of this dialectical law. One simple example is found in the concept
of the proletariat. While the proletariat is produced by capitalism for
the purpose of exploitation, it becomes the grave-digger of capital-
ism. And what Marx is pointing to in the above passage is that ele-
ments of socialism are already contained within the framework of
capitalist society, but they are the negation of this structure or order
of society. When they are freed from these bonds, and the expropri-
ators are expropriated, there is a negation of the former negation,
which, far from being a mere nothing, is a higher form of society—
socialism. Not to see this resolution of the contradictions in terms of
the negation of the negation, with its genuinely positive aspects,
may mean to think of resolving the contradictions by going back-
wards to an earlier form of society before these contradictions arose.
The negation of negation points always towards the resolution of
any and every contradiction in nature and society through a forward
movement which brings into being new forces and conditions. Thus
it is that Engels calls it “an extremely general—and for this reason
extremely comprehensive and important—law of development of
Nature, history and thought; a law which holds good in the animal
and plant kingdom, in geology, in mathematics, in history, and in
philosophy.” (Anti-Dühring, p. 154.)