People's Republic of China

From Leftypedia
(Redirected from PRC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Citationsneeded.svg.png This page makes use of insufficient high quality sources. You can help out by finding more references that back up statements in the text. Remember that Leftypedia prefers citations of the original authors.

The People's Republic of China (PRC) is a country in East Asia governed by the Communist Party of China. It is the world's most populous country, and the third or fourth largest country in the world (depending on the metric used). China is a controversial subject among leftists, with strong support and opposition to China occurring on all sides.

People's Republic of China


The People's Republic of China
Map of the People's Republic of China

Flag Flag of the PRC State Emblem Emblem of the PRC



Civil war[edit]


After the fall of Qing Dynasty in 1911, China was ravaged by foreign influence by Japanese, British and French. On 1921, with patrons from Soviet Union, the communist party of China was founded. The Communist and Nationalist shared a front to restore China to it's past greatness. The united front which was founded in 1924 focused on the internal enemy which were the warlord. After the front proved successful, the nationalist slaughtered communist in 1927. Mao Zhedong differed from the founders in that he thought the true revolutionary force in China, wasn't the proletariat, but rather the peasantry. In 1934 communist in the encircled in their base in Jiangxi. To escape the nationalist they set out on the long march. During the long march of 1934, by criticizing Zhang Guato, Mao in large part rose to power. According to him, the communist were loosing because of bad organization. What was observed during the march was the different culture of Miao had compared to the Han. He promised that different nationalities could form their own nations, or willingly join the PRC. The Hui Muslims were promised to be able to choose their own religion and attend visits to mosques. Because of the war with Japan that started in 1930's, there were multiple attempts for nationalist and communist to cooperate, or at least stop fighting. In 1935 a CPC sent to Guomindang (nationalist) was sent to stop fighting in north east. During the december of 1936, Chiang Kai-shek was kidnapped by his own generals who urged him to cooperate with CPC. In 1937, Marco Polo Bridge incident caused a full scale war with Japan and an united front was formed. During the war Mao showed ability for compromise if it helped the CPC. Various Warlords were convinced to become an ally or join the CPC. Yan Xishan, who was in charge of Shanxi, declared neutrally with CPC on 1939. There was cooperation with American forces, with intelligence sharing and neutrality. A land reform was pursued in 1934 which allowed private farms to peasants. After the bombs on Japan fell the war was declared to have been ended.


With the end of war talks between the nationalist and communist began in Chongqing, but the talks proved fruitless. In December of 1945, US arranged second talks with the opposing forces. The talks proved fruitless yet again with communist never trusting the Guomindang in keeping liberated areas for the CPC, and the Guomindang not trusting CPC in recognizing Chiang as the leader of China. Imminently after the war Chiang sent his troops toward north-east China, where the communist troops and bases were. During this time both the CPC and the nationalist prepared for war. In 1945 party congress in Yanan took place in preparation of the upcoming civil war. The central military committee was established with high ranking CPC members having being appointed to leading roles. While nationalist certainly had a larger piece of the land and army, they weren't approved by the general population. Desertions among the soldiers of the nationalist army was common, with men being roped together to not escape. From 1937 to 1949, fifteen million starved because troops used to sell their rations to the peasants. Since a great deal of the army had troops from the warlords, rape and plunder was common. On CPC side, Mao got 200,000 troops from Manchuguo. Those who didn't join the PLA were executed.[citation needed] The CPC also gained a great number of troops from the deserted ones from the nationalist army. Other failure of the nationalist was that they allowed landlords, which were unpopular with the peasantry, to return after the war to their property. The Communists, knowing well how unpopular landlords were among the peasantry, humiliated and executed them. The CPC control over Harbin, area which the Japanese occupation industrialized, proved to be important in their victory, and allowed CPC to build a modern army. With communist evacuated from the area, Yanan fell to the Guomindang in 1947. After this Mao declared the annihilation of the Chiang's regime. After that the Guomindang tried spreading their reach within the country. With most of it's units being sparse, a counter-attack by the communist proved easy. In 1947 the CPC in Ningxia and Gansu were winning against the Muslim warlords. By 1948, Mao was convinced an attack, rather than defense, on the Guangdong was possible. the CPC was winning against the nationalist in north east, and with it overtook Shenyang and moved south.


Chiang troops gathered around Xuzhou with the hope of having enough time to counter-act the movement of PLA into the heart of China. With CPC having enlisted POW from the Guomindang troops into PLA, the attack could start instantaneous. Within five days Xuzhou, with it's supplies cut off and heavy rain making it's tank useless, was under CPC's wing with it's general Baitao committing suicide. At this time Mao thought that Beijing, while useless in strategy, would give much prestige. On January of 1949, Fu Zuoyi, who guarded Beijing, was promised that if he allowed the CPC to take Beijing, his war-crimes would be absolved, his fortune kept, and would be allowed to live where he wishes. On January of 1949, he accepted the term and People's liberation army stormed Beijing in. In April of 1949, Zhang Zhizhong, the governor of Xinjiang, joined the CPC. The majority of nationalist forces were defeated, and with it Chiang fled on a plane from Chengdu to Taiwan, which he brutally took over. On first of October, 1949, Mao declared from the forbidden city than the civil war has been won and People's Republic of China was found.

Great Leap Forward[edit]

The Great Chinese Famine[edit]

The Great Chinese Famine (1958 till 1961) was caused and its severity compounded by a number of factors:

  • Bad weather conditions, floods and droughts at the same time;
  • The Four Pests Campaign;
  • Peasants transferring to steel production;
  • Bureaucratic mismanagement.

Four to five million people lost their lives.[1] [2] Official government statistics claim that fifteen million people perished as a result of the famine, but the composition of this statistic remains unclear (some suspect that this was an exaggeration and meant to discredit Máo or legitimise Deng Xiaoping’s policy changes), and antisocialists usually insist that between 20 and 100 million innocents died,[3] a toll that counts millions of hypothetical babies as ‘deaths’.[4]

Amartya Sen and John Drèze point out that, while the Chinese famine was devastating, it pales in comparison to the ordinary mortality rates which occur under market economies in an otherwise comparable nation like India:

[I]t is important to note that despite the gigantic size of excess mortality in the Chinese famine, the extra mortality in India from regular deprivation in normal times vastly overshadows the former. Comparing India’s death rate of 12 per thousand with China’s of 7 per thousand, and applying that difference to the Indian population of 781 million in 1986, we get an estimate of excess normal mortality in India of 3.9 million per year. This implies that every eight years or so more people die in India because of its higher regular death rate than died in China in the gigantic famine of 1958–61. India seems to manage to fill its cupboard with more skeletons every eight years than China put there in its years of shame.

—Amartya Sen & John Drèze, [5]

This comes out to more than one hundred million excess deaths in India alone from 1947 (when India became formally independent) to 1980. As Paul Heideman put it:

In other words, though India experienced no concentrated period of starvation which can be easily identified and hung around the neck of a particular ideology, its ordinary conditions for the latter half of the twentieth century, in which an extraordinarily unequal distribution of land obtained, created an excess mortality that, over the long term, dwarfed that of the worst famine of the century.

This demonstrates the effects that capitalism has on a developing nation, but it is all the more troublesome when compared to the immense gains made in the People’s Republic of China.

Cultural Revolution[edit]

Market reform[edit]

Tiananmen Square Incident 1989[edit]

China today[edit]

Political Economy[edit]


'Socialist Commodity Production'[edit]


Despite having a reputation for being one of the world’s worst polluters, the PRC emits much less carbon dioxide person than Imperial America does, even while having a population that is five times greater.[6] [7] (The PRC’s emissions can also be attributed to the fact that most of the West manufactures its goods there; most of its pollution is probably caused by producing things that are exported to the West.) The PRC is nine years ahead of schedule on meeting its Paris agreement climate change goals,[8] and has met ultra-low power plant emissions in advance of the 2020 goal.[9] [10]



Because of its radical commitment to the elimination of poverty and to improving living conditions — a commitment in which Maoist as well as Marxist ideas and ideals played an important part — China did achieve many things that the Indian leadership failed to press for and pursue with any vigor. The elimination of widespread hunger, illiteracy, and ill health falls solidly in this category. When state action operates in the right direction, the results can be quite remarkable, as is illustrated by the social achievements of the pre-reform period.

—Amartya Sen, [11]

Another important comment summarizing the findings of the study is as follows:

We argue, in particular, that the accomplishments relating to education, healthcare, land reforms, and social change in the pre-reform period made significantly positive contributions to the achievements of the post-reform period. This is so not only in terms of their role in sustained high life expectancy and related achievements, but also in providing firm support for economic expansion based on market reforms.

—Amartya Sen, [11]

Professor Sen states here that the prereform period saw enormous increases in quality of life for the Chinese people, as well as important economic developments, without which the economic expansion following the 1979 market reforms most likely could not have taken place. He notes that during this period, a ‘remarkable reduction in chronic undernourishment took place,’ attributing this to the policies implemented by the people’s republic:

The casual processes through which the reduction of undernourishment was achieved involved extensive state action including redistributive policies, nutritional support, and of course health care (since undernourishment is frequently caused by parasitic diseases and other illnesses).

—Amartya Sen, [11]

Professor Sen focuses more attention on the remarkable advances in healthcare during this period:

China’s achievements in the field of health during the pre-reform period include a dramatic reduction of infant and child mortality and a remarkable expansion of longevity.

—Amartya Sen, [11]

It is also noted that the PRC’s life expectancy approximately doubled from approximately 35 years in 1949 to 68 years in 1981 (when the market reforms began to take effect).[12] Another source on public health in the short twentieth century PRC comes from the journal Population Studies, in a study conducted by researchers from Stanford University and the National Bureau for Economic Research. One important comment is as follows:

China’s growth in life expectancy at birth from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history.

—Babiarz KS, Eggleston K, Miller G, Zhang Q, [13]

This alone goes to show the massive benefits that the revolutionary socialist movement attained. More important information is provided in the study, dealing with hospital and medical resources:

Physician and hospital supply grew dramatically under Mao due to a variety of factors (including increases in government financing, the introduction of social insurance for urban public employees, and the launch of China’s Rural Cooperative Medical System in the mid-1950s). Rural Cooperative Medical Schemes (CMS) were vigorously promoted and became widespread in the late 1960s as part of the Cultural Revolution.

—Babiarz KS, Eggleston K, Miller G, Zhang Q, [13]

They also quote other research which found that the rapid gains in Chinese healthcare can be attributed to the specific policies that the communists implemented:

China’s mortality decline between 1953 and 1957, which resembles that of the US between 1900 and 1930, was “primarily due to the unique social organisation of Chinese public health practices.”

—Babiarz KS, Eggleston K, Miller G, Zhang Q, [13]

Note that China achieved in four years what Imperial America took three decades to accomplish, due to their differing systems (i.e. planned economics vs. market economics). The study also confirms the immense success of the PRC’s vaccination programs:

Systematic efforts to vaccinate the population against polio, measles, diphtheria, whooping cough, scarlet fever, and cholera were rapid and reputedly successful (China nearly eradicated smallpox within the span of only three years, with the last documented cases occurring in Tibet and Yunnan in 1960).

—Babiarz KS, Eggleston K, Miller G, Zhang Q, [13]

Additional citations for the claims in the above quotes are provided in the original study.


Professor Sen notes that the huge improvements (including dramatic increases in literacy) can be attributed primary to the pre-reform period:

China’s breakthrough in the field of elementary education had already taken place before the process of economic reform was initiated at the end of the seventies. Census data indicate, for instance, that literacy rates in 1982 for the 15–19 age group were already as high as 96 percent for males and 85 percent for females.

—Amartya Sen, [11]

Another study confirms Professor Sen’s analysis of education:

China made large strides in primary and secondary education under Mao.

—Babiarz KS, Eggleston K, Miller G, Zhang Q, [13]

See also[edit]


  1. "Cheng Enfu, A Study of Unnatural Deaths ... S&S 82,2 (April 2018) (1).pdf". Google Docs. Retrieved 2019-10-09. 
  2. "Sun Jingxian, Population Change During China's 'Three Years of Hardship' (1959-1961) CCPESR April 2016 (1).pdf". Google Docs. Retrieved 2019-10-09. 
  3. Ball, Joseph (2006-09-21). "Did Mao Really Kill Millions in the Great Leap Forward?". 
  5. Hunger and Public Action. Harvard University. 
  7. "CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita)". Retrieved 2020-01-10. 
  8. Vaughan, Adam. "China is on track to meet its climate change goals nine years early". Retrieved 2020-01-10. 
  9. "China meets ultra-low emissions in advance of the 2020 goal". Retrieved 2020-01-10. 
  10. "China is on track to meet its ultra-low emissions goals for 2020.". Retrieved 2020-01-10. 
  11. a b c d e Sen, Amartya (2006). Klasen, Stephan; Günther, Isabel. ed. Perspectives on the Economic and Human Development of India and China. Harvard University. doi:10.17875/gup2006-202. 
  12. Hipgrave, David (2011). "Communicable Disease Control in China: From Mao to Now". Journal of Global Health: 224–238. 
  13. a b c d e Singer Babiarz, Kimberly; Eggleston, Karen; Miller, Grant; Qiong, Zhangd (2014-10-13). "An exploration of China’s mortality decline under Mao: A provincial analysis, 1950–80". Population Studies: 39–56. doi:10.1080/00324728.2014.972432.